Recent research has demonstrated significant economic and performance advantages associated with the use of FerAppease® (maternal bovine appeasing substance; mBAS) in finishing cattle. Estimates indicate an average return on investment (ROI) of $90.50 per head for carcass value and $60.00 per head for live weight when FerAppease is administered at both initial processing and reimplantation.
The Role of Stress in Feedlot Performance
Stress incurred during transport and feedlot arrival remains a critical challenge for beef producers, often leading to suppressed immunity, bovine respiratory disease (BRD), and subsequent productivity losses.1 In a 60-day receiving trial involving high-risk cattle, steers treated with FerAppease at processing and again two weeks later exhibited an 83% reduction in mortality, reduced stress markers, and enhanced immune function relative to controls.2 These findings were notable given that all cattle were subjected to standard stress-inducing practices including transportation, castration, and environmental adjustment.
Mode of Action
FerAppease is a topical formulation applied behind the poll and across the muzzle. Its active compound is a synthetic analogue of mBAS, a pheromone naturally secreted by the mammary gland to reduce threat perception in nursing animals.
According to Dr. Reinaldo Cooke, Ph.D., Burkhart Endowed Professor for Beef Cattle Research at Texas A&M University, “This study quantified the substantial benefits of FerAppease on high-risk cattle, not only improving animal well-being but also increasing producer profitability. The results also raise questions about potential benefits for low-risk cattle.”
Low Cost, High Return
FerAppease requires a minimal investment – approximately $3.00 per head per 10 mL dose for cattle over 200 lbs. – making it a cost-effective strategy for reducing stress across multiple production stages.
Dr. Rodrigo Bicalho, DVM, Ph.D., CEO of FERA, emphasizes, “Given the inherent stress of cattle handling – trailers, squeeze chutes, and other routine practices – we believe all cattle, regardless of health or risk classification, stand to benefit from FerAppease.”
Texas A&M Research: Application in Low-Risk Cattle
To test this hypothesis, a trial3 was conducted on 240 Angus yearling steers previously backgrounded and transported six hours to a research facility in Bushland, Texas. Following a 24-hour rest, steers were randomly assigned to receive either 10 mL of FerAppease or a placebo (mineral oil) during intake processing. Processing included vaccination, deworming, and implantation.
Steers were housed in 30 pens (15 per treatment, 8 steers each) and fed identical total mixed rations (TMR). On day 75, all steers were re-implanted and received a second application of their assigned treatment. The finishing period lasted 138 days.
Economic Outcomes
Pen-level economic analysis revealed the following (Table 1):
-
Live weight ROI: $60/head ($480/pen) – 10:1 return
-
Carcass value ROI: $90.50/head ($724/pen) – 15:1 return
-
Cost of FerAppease per pen: ~$47.60 (two applications)
Table 1. Productive and economic outcomes of finishing steers administered FerAppease (mBAS) vs. control
| Item | Control | mBAS (FerAppease) | Difference (mBAS – CON) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Productive Responses | |||
| Initial live weight, lbs/pen | 7,254 | 7,237 | -17 |
| Final live weight, lbs/pen | 12,409 | 12,703 | +294 |
| Liveweight gain, lbs/pen | 5,155 | 5,466 | +311 |
| Hot carcass weight, lbs | 7,489 | 7,744 | +255 |
| Feed intake, lbs/pen | 28,570 | 29,388 | +818 |
| Gain:feed ratio | 0.180 | 0.185 | +0.005 |
| Economic Responses | |||
| Initial value, $/pen | 15,959 | 15,921 | -38 |
| Sale value – live weight, $/pen | 22,957 | 23,501 | +544 |
| Sale value – carcass, $/pen | 21,914 | 22,704 | +790 |
| Feed cost, $/pen | 3,566 | 3,692 | +126 |
| Medications/processing, $/pen | 159.2 | 159.5 | +0.3 |
| Profit – live weight, $/pen | 3,267 | 3,747 | +480 |
| Profit – carcass, $/pen | 2,225 | 2,949 | +724 |
Performance and Carcass Quality
Key performance improvements among FerAppease-treated cattle included:
-
ADG: 5.14 lbs/day vs. 4.97 lbs/day in controls (+0.17 lbs/day overall; +0.30 lbs/day post-reimplant).
-
Hot carcass weight: 984.2 lbs vs. 968.6 lbs in controls (+15.6 lbs).
-
Marbling score: 508.1 vs. 481.7 in controls.
-
Prime or Choice grading: 94.9% vs. 87.9% in controls.
“These results demonstrate not only improved weight gain but also enhanced carcass quality,” noted Cooke. “With FerAppease, there was no trade-off between growth efficiency and carcass value.”
Conclusion
Stress reduction is central to maximizing cattle performance and profitability. The evidence from Texas A&M indicates that FerAppease is an effective, low-cost intervention capable of improving average daily gain, carcass quality, and ultimately producer returns.
As Dr. Bicalho summarized:
“Stress undermines animal health, productivity, and carcass value. By mitigating stress with FerAppease, we create conditions for cattle to perform optimally – both on the hoof and on the rail.”
Bottom line: Reducing stress pays. FerAppease provides measurable gains in animal well-being and producer profitability.